Building a Financial Landscape with Mega-corporations
"I am convinced he (god) does not play dice." -
Albert Einstein
"Not only does god play dice. He is using loaded
dice." - John Ford
"God not only plays dice, he sometimes throws the dice
where they cannot be seen." - Stephen Hawking
When building a new setting, a lot of it can seem random,
and sometimes it is. Personally, I like to take the random bits and apply some
organization to them. The human brain is a pattern-seeking engine, and your
players will recognize patterns in your world. Those patterns will lead to
expectations. If you have already molded the chaos of your world building into
patterns yourself, you will be better prepared to direct those player
expectations. Not only that, but you will see patterns yourself as you continue
to build, which you can use to fill in details that will feel like logical
growths in the details you have already established.
One of my favorite tools to do that with is Keith J Davies' Polyhedral Pantheons. Very simply put, it
is a system for organizing a series of attributes into organized groups without
too much overlap or conflict, and establish relationships between each organized
group of attributes. And one of the benefits of it's organizational methods is
that it also lends very, very well to creating lists for rolling random results
as well. I'll let you check out his own material to learn how it works.
Originally, he designed it to help the prospective world builder design and
arrange the domains for an entire pantheon in a setting. It's probably the most
efficient tool I have ever seen for doing that. However, I have found that it
works pretty well with nearly any set of attributes you need to divide between
entities. And since entities can be anything from an individual to a
organization or kingdom, I have made extensive use of it in my own world
building.
My most recent use of it has been to develop a system of
Mega-corporations and the markets they work in in a Starfinder setting
that they have a great deal of influence over. They are essentially the ruling
bodies. How they interact with the various markets in the setting can have
direct effect on the players. In this setting, which I have yet to name, the
ever-shifting tides of power and influence between the competing mega-corps can
seem random from the player's perspective, and to some degree it is. I wanted
some structure to the process however.
My first step was of course to come up with the list of
attributes to describe my mega-corps. I realized relatively early on that as
mega-corps every one of them will have fingers in basically every part of the
economy. But each would have a core attributes that would inform their
relationship with the other areas of the economy. Further, specific local
branches would have might have other specific focuses that don't necessarily
match the parent corp's core attributes. And it would be the relationship
between the parent corp's values with the local branch's values, in the context
of the values of the market that local branch was operating in that would begin
to show the complex interweave of economic relationships. And the polyhedral
system would do most of the work of building those patterns for me.
To start with I decided I would use the d12 and d20
polyhedral charts from Keith's system. If you look into his material you find
that they are complementary. This would also mean that the eventual random
charts I would create would have the user roll a d12 and a d20. Here are the
two lists of attributes I arrived at:
Image is "Enidoi" by TacoSauceNinja on DeviantArt |
d20
1. Transportation and Warehousing
2. Food
3. Information
4. Exploration
5. Domestics
6. Entertainment and Recreation
7. Journalism
8. Pharmaceuticals
9. Zoological
10. Construction and Real Estate Development
11. Military
12. Espionage
13. Education
14. Restoration and Recovery
15. Labor
16. Utilities and Infrastructure
17. Health and Social Care
18. Agriculture and Hydroponics
19. Mining and Resource Extraction
20. I could tell you but I’d have to kill you
d12
1. Research and Development
2. Marketing
3. Operations
4. Sales
5. Maintenance
6. Manufacturing
7. Acquisitions
8. Personnel
9. Management
10. Distribution/Logistics
11. Finance
12. Black Ops
Now, if you are as observant as Keith was (I talk to him
about a lot of the ideas I use his tools on), you'll almost immediately note
that there could be some overlap on a lot of those categories. Food could be
rolled into agriculture and hydroponics for example. This is by design.
Remember that this is to inform you of relationships. SO if you get a result
that have both "food" and "agriculture and hydroponics"
rather than thinking "how are these the same" you can also consider
"why are these noted separately for this corp?" For example, it maybe
that the corp both grows the food and processes it into prepared foodstuffs,
like ready-to-eat meals. Or another example "black ops" and "I
could tell you but I'd have to kill you" both sound like basically the same
thing, but you could have black ops and then really, really black ops when you
get both attributes; and you could even have an organization that's not doing
black ops at all but remains so secretive that they kill to preserve their
secret.
There is no wrong answer, since the purpose is to use the
pattern to inspire the relationships you are creating for your world.
The next step is to group these attributes into the core
values of my corporations. I'm not gonna get into the details of how that grouping
works, you can check out Keith's material for that. Basically, the two lists
above will combine into the core attributes of 32 distinct entities, with the
first item in each one being their primary focus, and the rest are the
secondary ones.
I'll jump right to those results:
Image is "Pollution B" by TacoSauceNinja on DeviantArt |
1. Transportation
and Warehousing, Research and Development, Marketing, Operations
2. Food,
Personnel, Distribution/Logistics, Black Ops
3. Information,
Research and Development, Maintenance, Manufacturing
4. Exploration,
Acquisitions, Management, Black Ops
5. Domestics,
Marketing, Acquisitions, Personnel
6. Entertainment
and Recreation, Maintenance, Management, Finance
7. Journalism,
Research and Development, Marketing, Sales
8. Pharmaceuticals,
Manufacturing, Distribution/Logistics, Finance
9. Zoological,
Operations, Maintenance, Management
10. Construction
and Real Estate Development, Sales, Manufacturing, Distribution/Logistics
11. Military,
Operations, Acquisitions, Management
12. Espionage,
Sales, Personnel, Distribution/Logistics
13. Education,
Marketing, Operations, Acquisitions
14. Restoration
and Recovery, Management, Finance, Black Ops
15. Labor,
Marketing, Sales, Personnel
16. Utilities
and Infrastructure, Maintenance, Manufacturing, Finance
17. Health and
Social Care, Research and Development, Sales, Manufacturing
18. Agriculture
and Hydroponics, Acquisitions, Personnel, Black Ops
19. Mining and
Resource Extraction, Research and Development, Operations, Maintenance
20. I could
tell you but I’d have to kill you, Distribution/Logistics, Finance, Black Ops
21. Research
and Development, Transportation and Warehousing, Information, Journalism, Health
and Social Care, Mining and Resource Extraction
22. Marketing,
Transportation and Warehousing, Domestics, Journalism, Education, Labor
23. Operations,
Transportation and Warehousing, Zoological, Military, Education, Mining and
Resource Extraction
24. Sales,
Journalism, Construction and Real Estate Development, Espionage, Labor, Health
and Social Care
25. Maintenance,
Information, Entertainment and Recreation, Zoological, Utilities and
Infrastructure, Mining and Resource Extraction
26. Manufacturing,
Information, Pharmaceuticals, Construction and Real Estate Development,
Utilities and Infrastructure, Health and Social Care
27. Acquisitions,
Exploration, Domestics, Military, Education, Agriculture and Hydroponics
28. Personnel,
Food, Domestics, Espionage, Labor, Agriculture and Hydroponics
29. Management,
Exploration, Entertainment and Recreation, Zoological, Military, Restoration
and Recovery
30. Distribution/Logistics,
Food, Pharmaceuticals, Construction and Real Estate Development, Espionage, I
could tell you but I’d have to kill you
31. Finance,
Entertainment and Recreation, Pharmaceuticals, Restoration and Recovery,
Utilities and Infrastructure, I could tell you but I’d have to kill you
32. Black Ops,
Food, Exploration, Restoration and Recovery, Agriculture and Hydroponics, I
could tell you but I’d have to kill you
This is just an initial list, and by no means final. Keith has
suggested several improvements, like adding positive and negative attitudes to
the lists of attributes, to reflect each corp's attitude towards those
attributes. But it does give you an idea of how this tool can organize your
world building. At this point I can just look at one of those groups of
attributes and the corporation they suggest starts building itself in my
mind.
And that is the ideal, the golden standard of world building: for
it to be writing itself as you go. If it unfolds for you, then the only thing
you have to do is record it. The patterns are already there, the connections
between them drawn.
So the next step is to get the attributes for the various markets.
That's pretty easy to do: I just randomly re-order the lists above and go
through the same process using the same attributes. This gives me the various
regions and the things people are most interested in, in those regions.
Lastly, I create the local branch for a corp. That's even easier. I
roll a d20 and a d12 and use those attributes as the focus of that local
branch. You now have the things the mega-corp thinks are most important, the
things the market values, and the purpose of the local branch. You can tell
what kind of support he parent corp is giving the branch, what the local branch
does for that parent, and how both of those relate to the local market. That's
a LOT of information to get just from filling out a few lists of attributes and
letting a spreadsheet organize them for me. And you can extrapolate even
more.
I can roll a d20 and a d12 and consult the chart I used for the
markets to see where forces are shifting in the local mark that day. Then when
the PCs go visit that branch you might extrapolate from those market forces how
their point of contact is doing, because you know what is stressing them that
day. In fact, they might just want the players to go do something about those
stresses. Or it might be a great day for them, and they are offering a bargain
to the players.
As I said before, it's all about what the patterns inspire you to
do. And this tool helps you form patterns like no other. And the best things
is, Keith seems to love talking to people about this tool, and he can make it
figuratively sing with results and new ways to use it.
Another time I'll tell you all about the setting I am working on,
and the financial systems I am developing for it.
Until then, go out there and play god with your world building: use dice and make them loaded.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.